Universal Code Beautifier

Reformats source code with consistent indentation and spacing across several languages. Useful for reading something minified, inherited or pasted from a chat that mangled it.

Live demo · real result from this tool
Indent

Beautified

const total = items  .filter((i) => i.active)  .map((i) => ({ ...i, price: i.price * 1.18 }))  .reduce((a, b) => a + b.price, 0);function fmt(n) {  return new Intl.NumberFormat("en-IN", {    style: "currency",    currency: "INR",  }).format(n);} 

Processed on your device — nothing is uploaded.

How to use Universal Code Beautifier

  1. Paste your code and select the language.
  2. Read the formatted output.
  3. Copy it back — and set up a real formatter for anything you maintain.
  4. Python and YAML are indentation-sensitive: reformatting can change meaning, not just layout.
  5. Formatting does not validate — syntax errors remain syntax errors.
  6. Code stays in your browser and is not transmitted.

Formatting is a readability tool, not a correctness one

Whitespace changes nothing about what most languages do — with real exceptions. Python indentation is the block structure, so reformatting it can change behaviour rather than appearance. YAML is the same. In brace languages the risk is lower but not zero: JavaScript’s automatic semicolon insertion means joining or splitting lines can alter parsing in a handful of cases. Read the output rather than trusting it, particularly for indentation-sensitive languages.

The argument about style is the point of automating it

Tabs against spaces, brace placement, line length — these have consumed an extraordinary amount of engineering attention over decades, and none of the answers matter. What matters is that a codebase is consistent, so that a diff shows what changed rather than who edited it. That is why the modern answer is an opinionated formatter with almost no options: Prettier, Black, gofmt, rustfmt. Removing the choice removes the argument.

Put it in the pipeline, not in a browser tab

For a project, run the formatter on save and in a pre-commit hook, with the configuration committed. Then formatting never appears in a pull request, every contributor produces identical output, and code review is about the code. A web formatter is for a snippet you are reading once — pasting project code into a browser to reformat it and pasting it back is a workflow that will eventually lose something.

Frequently asked questions

What languages are supported?
The beautifier works with most common languages by applying universal formatting rules: proper indentation, consistent spacing, and line breaks.
How does it differ from language-specific formatters?
Language-specific formatters understand syntax deeply. This universal tool applies general formatting principles that improve readability across languages.
Is the output production-ready?
The output is more readable but may not match all style guides. For production, use language-specific formatters and linters.
Can formatting break my code?
In Python and YAML, yes — indentation carries meaning there, so a reformat can change structure. In brace languages it is generally safe, with JavaScript's automatic semicolon insertion as the edge case worth knowing about.
Tabs or spaces?
Whichever your project already uses. The choice has no technical merit either way; consistency does, because it keeps diffs meaningful. Tabs have one genuine argument in their favour: readers can set their own indent width, which helps some people with low vision.
Should I use this or a proper formatter?
This for a snippet you are reading. Prettier, Black, gofmt or rustfmt for a project, run on save and in a pre-commit hook with the configuration committed — so formatting stays out of your diffs entirely.

Written by the ToolsRift team · Last updated

Pages are drafted with AI assistance and checked by automated tests. How we write and check pages.

Was this tool useful?

Report a problem

Start typing to search every tool.

↑ ↓ to moveEnter to openEsc to close